The email you want to send, into the one you can.

Write it properly angry first. Paste it in. Get back something sendable that still says the thing you were angry about.

Free, no accountTen runs a dayNothing you paste is stored
What you typed at 18:40

This is the fourth time I have asked for the same file.

Every week you tell me it is coming and every week it does not, and now we are going to miss the filing date because of it.

What you can actually send

I have asked for this file four times now, on 2, 9, 16 and 23 September.

Each time the answer has been that it is coming. We are now close enough to the filing date that I need it by Thursday, or we have to talk about moving the date.

What you typed at 18:40 What you can actually send

The grievance survives, the damage does not

Worked example

In practice.

What has to survive

The specific failure, with dates

How many times it has happened

The consequence, stated plainly

What you need, and by when

What has to go
  • Character judgementsUnprofessional and careless are conclusions, and they end the conversation
  • AbsolutesAlways and never invite a counterexample instead of an answer
  • Rhetorical questionsDo you have any idea is not a question anybody answers
  • The audienceCopying three people in to make a point is a separate decision, made calmly

A good rewrite reads colder, not softer. The version that actually works keeps every fact and drops every adjective, which is more pointed than the angry draft was.

The workflow

How it works.

  1. STEP 01

    Write the angry one first

    Properly. It is the fastest way to find out what you actually object to, which is usually narrower than it feels.

  2. STEP 02

    Paste it in

    Nothing you paste is stored, which matters more here than on any of the other tools.

  3. STEP 03

    Check what it kept

    The rewrite should still contain the complaint, the count and the consequence. If it only contains an apology, do not send it.

Honest limits

Where it does not help.

Do not soften a paper trail

Disputes, HR matters and anything a lawyer may read later want the plain record, not the pleasant version.

Do not soften a safety issue

If something is dangerous or a hard deadline is about to be missed, plain and urgent beats measured.

Sleep on it anyway

The tool removes the damage from the draft. It cannot tell you whether the email should exist.

Some conversations are not email

Four failures in a row is usually a call. The rewrite will happily help you avoid making it.

Where the line sits

This page works on one paste.

The free tool

On demand

  • Rewrites the draft you paste
  • Keeps the complaint, the count and the consequence
  • Drops the judgements and the absolutes
  • Free, no account, nothing stored
Pidgy

Without asking

  • Chases the thread before it gets to this
  • Notices when somebody has gone quiet for days
  • Drafts the follow-up while it is still routine
  • You press send, always

Most of these emails exist because three polite ones were never sent. That is a tracking problem rather than a writing one.

Why it adds up

What email actually costs.

58%

of the working day goes to coordination about work: chasing updates, hunting documents, confirming status.

Asana Anatomy of Work
Questions

Answered.

Is it free?

Yes. No account, ten runs a day, and nothing you paste is stored, which is worth knowing given what people paste into this one.

Will it remove my complaint?

It should not. A rewrite that leaves only an apology has failed. Check that the count, the dates and the consequence are all still there before you send.

Is it safe to paste a heated draft?

Nothing is stored. Still, treat it as you would any third-party tool and take out names and figures if the matter is sensitive.

When should I not use it?

Dispute paper trails, HR matters and safety or deadline emergencies. Those want the plain record.

This email exists because three were never sent.

Pidgy notices when a thread goes quiet and drafts the chase while it is still a routine one.