A practical checklist that helps audit teams assess whether a secure audit collaboration platform fits their file-sharing, request management, and follow-up needs better than Inflo.
Before moving from Inflo, check what you actually use it for: if it is analytics-led audit, stay; if it is mainly requests, collection, and follow-up, a focused EU-native platform may fit better. These eight checks help decide, with Alkmist as one option.
Inflo is a capable, analytics-led digital audit platform. Teams sometimes adopt the whole thing when their real need is the request-and-collect workflow, and pay in complexity and cost.
These eight checks clarify whether a focused move makes sense, or whether Inflo’s breadth is what you want.
Work through these before you move.
If it is analytics-led audit, Inflo’s strength, stay. If it is requests and collection, read on.
Do you need structured, reusable PBC request lists front and centre?
Is status-driven client follow-up a priority for your team?
Would a simpler, branded client portal lift response rates?
Do you need data kept in the EU under EU control?
Would a focused tool be faster to roll out than a broad platform?
Are you paying for analytics breadth you do not use?
Can request lists and history move across cleanly?
See Alkmist in action
See how Alkmist handles audit requests and collaboration. Book a demo.